Back to feed
Dev.to
Dev.to
7/15/2026
Benchmarking China's open-weight AI models: DeepSeek, Qwen, Kimi, and GLM compared

Benchmarking China's open-weight AI models: DeepSeek, Qwen, Kimi, and GLM compared

Original: I Pitted China's Best Open AI Models Against Each Other

Short summary

A hands-on comparison of four Chinese open-weight AI model families — DeepSeek, Qwen, Kimi, and GLM — tested on coding, reasoning, multilingual, speed, and cost dimensions. DeepSeek V4 Flash emerges as the best budget pick at $0.25/1M tokens with top coding scores. The author replaced all OpenAI/Anthropic calls with these models via Global API's unified endpoint, citing vendor lock-in concerns and significant cost savings.

  • DeepSeek V4 Flash rated best overall at $0.25/1M output tokens with 5-star coding
  • Qwen3-8B cheapest at $0.01/1M tokens; GLM-4-9B also ultra-cheap
  • Kimi positioned as premium-only with strong Chinese language performance
  • All models accessed via Global API's OpenAI-compatible endpoint
  • Global API product promoted throughout the article

Generated with AI, which can make mistakes.

Is this a good recommendation for you?

Comments

Failed to load comments. Please try again.

Explore more