National Law Review
7/7/2026

The original title is "Workplace Investigations- Five Key Takeaways (Part Two)"
Original: Workplace Investigations- Five Key Takeaways (Part Two)
Short summary
This article covers key legal considerations for conducting workplace investigations, focusing on legal privilege and the rights of accused individuals. It explains that privilege is complex and should be assessed early, noting that fact-finding by in-house counsel is typically not privileged while legal advice may be. The article also stresses that suspension must be a carefully considered decision, not a knee-jerk reaction, and that accused employees retain important rights including welfare check-ins and fair process.
- •Legal privilege should be assessed at the start of every investigation; fact-finding is rarely privileged even when done by counsel
- •Suspension must be a carefully considered decision, not a knee-jerk reaction, with alternatives like temporary transfer considered
- •Accused employees have rights too — regular check-ins, prompt investigation, and avoiding pre-judgment are essential to prevent constructive dismissal claims
Generated with AI, which can make mistakes.
Is this a good recommendation for you?



