Dev.to
7/6/2026
![The original title is: "LLM Quantization Levels Compared: Q4_K_M vs Q8_0 vs FP16 [2026]"](https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=1200,height=627,fit=cover,gravity=auto,format=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2F3uwk3zkodv9vbcyghawg.png)
The original title is: "LLM Quantization Levels Compared: Q4_K_M vs Q8_0 vs FP16 [2026]"
Original: LLM Quantization Levels Compared: Q4_K_M vs Q8_0 vs FP16 [2026]
Short summary
Q4_K_M is the optimal default quantization for consumer LLM inference — it cuts memory by 65% versus FP16 while preserving 95-97% quality and doubling throughput. Q8_0 is effectively lossless for structured tasks. Model size matters more than quantization precision: a 70B at Q4_K_M typically outperforms a 7B at Q8_0.
- •Q4_K_M is Pareto-optimal: 65% less VRAM than FP16, 2-3× faster, only 3-5% quality loss
- •Q8_0 is lossless for coding/reasoning tasks; 2× VRAM cost justified for structured work
- •Model size beats quantization precision: 70B at Q4_K_M outperforms 8B at Q8_0
Generated with AI, which can make mistakes.
Is this a good recommendation for you?



