Three Juejin roundups, three scorecards, no shared bridge

Short summary

Three late-2025 Juejin roundups about which AI tools to use in 2026 each rank on different axes — IDE code completion, consumer chat, and frontend UI — making their recommendations incomparable. Tools like Cursor, GitHub Copilot, ChatGPT, and Claude appear across lists but are judged on entirely different criteria with no cross-format bridge. The author concludes engineers must manually synthesize multiple ranking formats to assemble a realistic 2026 AI stack, and the combined cost approaches a mortgage payment.

• •Three Juejin roundups use incompatible scorecards (decimal, yuan-mode, five-star) to rank 2026 AI tools
• •Shared tools like Cursor, ChatGPT, and Claude appear but are judged on different axes with no cross-comparison
• •Author finds combined stack cost far exceeds any single roundup's hint, requiring manual synthesis

Generated with AI, which can make mistakes.