1. **Analyze the original title:** "What Six Arguing AI Agents Taught Me About Building One That Actually Works"

Short summary

A developer built a six-agent debate system for code analysis but found it hallucinated 124 false vulnerabilities. After pivoting to a simpler sequential architecture—one agent maps code, two others analyze it—the system correctly identified real issues. The Synod project demonstrates that architectural simplicity and thoughtful orchestration beat raw agent count.

• •Debate architecture with six agents produced 124 false positives out of 127 flagged vulnerabilities
• •Sequential pipeline—map → analyze → validate—eliminated hallucinations and correctly identified real issues
• •Lesson: agent effectiveness depends on orchestration design, not agent count

Generated with AI, which can make mistakes.