Dev.to
7/20/2026

Open-source lab compares SSG, SSR, and ISR rendering performance on real WordPress content
Original: I built a test lab to measure SSG vs SSR vs ISR on real WordPress, here's what I found
Short summary
The author built an open-source test lab (astro-wp-seo-lab) that renders the same WordPress content four ways using Astro 7.1.1: full SSG, SSR, SSR with CDN cache, and route caching (ISR). The lab lets developers run side-by-side comparisons to see real differences in freshness, caching behavior, and SEO tradeoffs. Key finding: SSG timestamps are frozen at build time, SSR changes per request, and route caching with TTL delivers ISR behavior that balances freshness and cost.
- •Open-source lab compares SSG, SSR, SSR-CDN, and route-cache (ISR) rendering of identical WordPress content
- •SSG freezes content at build time; SSR renders per request; route caching with TTL provides ISR behavior
- •SEO tradeoff: SSR reflects edits instantly but costs 10,000 renders for 10,000 Googlebot crawls vs SSG rebuild-on-change
Generated with AI, which can make mistakes.
Is this a good recommendation for you?



