Dev.to
7/4/2026

The original title is "Still in the Game: Why We Keep Coding Against the Machine"
Original: Still in the Game: Why We Keep Coding Against the Machine
Short summary
Drawing parallels to chess after Deep Blue, the author argues AI won't make coding obsolete—just like chess thrived post-Kasparov. Developers who practice deliberately, reason through tradeoffs, and understand failures build judgment and depth that speed contests can't measure. The value isn't in winning against the machine; it's in structured practice that sharpens human skill.
- •Chess remained vital after Deep Blue because the discipline itself stayed valuable
- •Coding will follow the same arc—tools raise the ceiling but don't remove the floor
- •Developers practicing deliberately develop judgment that transcends speed contests
Generated with AI, which can make mistakes.
Is this a good recommendation for you?



