Back to feed
Dev.to
Dev.to
7/4/2026
Two AI reviews passed my change. The correct architecture was documented one file away.

Two AI reviews passed my change. The correct architecture was documented one file away.

Short summary

Two AI code reviewers both missed a subtle .mjs module resolution bug because they evaluated code in a local ESM environment while the deployed runtime used CommonJS. The deeper lesson: stacking reviewers with overlapping scopes multiplies confidence without expanding coverage; true defense in depth requires uncorrelated checks evaluating different signals.

  • AI code review missed a module packaging error (.mjs imported via require()) that only surfaced at runtime in deployed environment
  • Both models shared the same scope (local logic correctness); overlapping scopes create false confidence, not redundancy
  • Real verification requires uncorrelated checks with different scopes: semantic analysis, environment awareness, documentation review

Generated with AI, which can make mistakes.

Is this a good recommendation for you?

Comments

Failed to load comments. Please try again.

Explore more