The original headline is about a TCPA defendant avoiding fees and sanctions after their original attorney stopped communicating.

Short summary

A District of Oregon court denied a TCPA plaintiff's motions for attorney's fees and sanctions after the defendant's original attorney disappeared and stopped communicating. The court found the discovery failures were caused by the vanished attorney, not the client, and that new counsel diligently cured deficiencies. The court also rejected the argument that the defendant controlled records held by third-party marketing vendors Yotpo and Klaviyo.

• •Court denied fees and sanctions after defendant's attorney vanished mid-case
• •New counsel cured discovery deficiencies; court found failures were attorney's fault not client's
• •Court rejected plaintiff's claim that defendant controlled third-party vendor records from Yotpo and Klaviyo

Generated with AI, which can make mistakes.