arXiv cs.LG
7/17/2026

Position: Explainability Research Must Prioritize Foundations over Ad-hoc Methods
Short summary
This position paper argues that the XAI field must shift from developing ad-hoc explanation methods toward solving foundational challenges like problem formulation, evaluation objectives, and feedback pipelines. The authors analyze recent ICML, NeurIPS, and ICLR papers plus a practitioner survey to show recurring gaps that limit cumulative progress. They propose a practical checklist to move XAI toward a human-centered, action-oriented paradigm.
- •XAI explanations rarely influence real-world workflows due to foundational gaps
- •Analysis of top ML conference papers and practitioner survey reveals recurring issues
- •Proposes a checklist to shift XAI toward action-oriented, feedback-driven systems
Generated with AI, which can make mistakes.
Is this a good recommendation for you?