Court Rejects Arbitration in LaserAway Case, Finding 'GET MORE INFO' Button Lacks Unambiguous Assent to Terms

Short summary

In Caroline Wong v. LaserAway, the Northern District of California denied a motion to compel arbitration, finding that a 'GET MORE INFO' button did not constitute unambiguous assent to Terms and Conditions. The court classified the agreement as a sign-in wrap, noting that while the hyperlink was conspicuous, the button language failed to communicate that clicking constituted agreement. The decision underscores that buttons must expressly state they bind users to terms.

• •Court rejected arbitration because 'GET MORE INFO' button lacked unambiguous assent to Terms and Conditions
• •Sign-in wrap agreements require both conspicuous notice and clear manifestation of assent
• •Buttons must expressly communicate that clicking constitutes agreement to terms

Generated with AI, which can make mistakes.