Back to feed
National Law Review
National Law Review
7/20/2026
The headline needs to convey that non-importer companies can face customs fraud liability under the False Claims Act, even with DDP terms.

The headline needs to convey that non-importer companies can face customs fraud liability under the False Claims Act, even with DDP terms.

Original: A Company That Isn’t The Importer Of Record Can’t Get In Trouble For Customs Fraud, Right? Wrong!

Short summary

A legal article explains that companies relying on 'delivered duty paid' (DDP) Incoterms to avoid customs liability are mistaken. Under the False Claims Act, even non-importer-of-record parties can face treble damages for customs fraud. The author, a qui tam attorney, illustrates how private agreements allocating duty responsibility do not bind the government.

  • DDP Incoterms do not shield buyers from customs fraud liability
  • False Claims Act qui tam cases can target non-IOR companies
  • Treble damages plus penalties apply; relators get 15-30% of recovery

Generated with AI, which can make mistakes.

Is this a good recommendation for you?

Comments

Failed to load comments. Please try again.

Explore more