National Law Review
7/15/2026

California's minor social media laws: How SB 976 and AB 56 reshape platform liability and youth-harm litigation
Original: From "Addictive Feeds" to Under-16 Bans: Courts Will Soon Ask What Parents and Platforms Can Prove
Short summary
California is building a two-part regulatory regime for minors on social media: SB 976 mandates parental consent, time caps, and notification limits for addictive feeds, while AB 56 requires Surgeon General-style mental health warnings. Proposals like AB 1709 would bar under-16 access entirely. These laws create evidentiary baselines that will reshape youth-harm litigation, making platform logs and parental control settings key evidence in future lawsuits.
- •California's SB 976 and AB 56 impose design requirements on platforms serving minors, including time caps and mental health warnings
- •Age-gating proposals like AB 1709 would restrict under-16 access, raising constitutional and privacy challenges
- •Statutory defaults will become litigation yardsticks, making platform logs and parental control settings key evidence in youth-harm cases
Generated with AI, which can make mistakes.
Is this a good recommendation for you?


