Back to feed
National Law Review
National Law Review
7/16/2026
Proposed RFO Rule Would Create Procurement Integrity-Specific Process for Protecting or Releasing Contractors’ Proprietary Information

Proposed RFO Rule Would Create Procurement Integrity-Specific Process for Protecting or Releasing Contractors’ Proprietary Information

Short summary

The FAR Council proposed revisions to FAR Part 3 as part of the Revolutionary FAR Overhaul process, including a new procurement integrity-specific process for handling contractor proprietary markings on bid and proposal information. Contractors may need to justify proposal markings and should consider using solicitation Q&As, agency engagement, protests, or claims depending on timing. The proposed rule retains core procurement integrity, conflict-of-interest, and anti-kickback provisions while streamlining administrative text.

  • FAR Council proposed FAR Part 3 revisions creating procurement integrity-specific process for contractor markings
  • Contractors may need to justify proposal markings; options include Q&As, agency engagement, protests, or claims
  • Core procurement integrity and conflict-of-interest provisions retained while administrative text streamlined

Generated with AI, which can make mistakes.

Is this a good recommendation for you?

Comments

Failed to load comments. Please try again.

Explore more