National Law Review
7/1/2026

3rd Circ. Backs Denial of University Secretary’s Remote Work Accommodation Request
Short summary
The Third Circuit Court upheld a university's denial of a secretary's request to work remotely as a disability accommodation, finding her role had essential in-person duties. The court rejected the argument that reassigning tasks to other staff constituted a reasonable accommodation. The ruling signals employers with return-to-office policies will likely prevail in defending against remote-work ADA claims if job descriptions clearly document in-person responsibilities.
- •Third Circuit ruled that remote work denial was not discriminatory when job has essential in-person duties
- •Court rejected reallocation of tasks to other staff as a reasonable accommodation under ADA
- •Employers should document in-person job responsibilities in job descriptions to defend against accommodation claims
Generated with AI, which can make mistakes.
Is this a good recommendation for you?



