Back to feed
Dev.to
Dev.to
7/5/2026
AgentGuard vs Semgrep vs CodeQL: 100 Percent vs 0 Percent on AI Agent Security

AgentGuard vs Semgrep vs CodeQL: 100 Percent vs 0 Percent on AI Agent Security

Short summary

AgentGuard achieved 100% detection on 39 AI agent security samples with zero false positives while Semgrep and CodeQL detected nothing, exposing a critical gap in existing tooling. The scanner's 17 rules cover OWASP ASI categories plus four novel vectors (Memory Poisoning, Tool Output Trust, Action Chain Amplification, Multi-Agent Collusion), uncovering 332 critical vulnerabilities in AutoGen and LlamaIndex. Available via GitHub and PyPI.

  • •AgentGuard detected 100% of AI agent security issues vs 0% for Semgrep and CodeQL
  • •17 detection rules covering OWASP ASI plus 4 novel attack vectors
  • •Found 332 critical vulnerabilities in AutoGen and LlamaIndex frameworks

Generated with AI, which can make mistakes.

#ai-agents#ai-tools
Read full article at Dev.to

Is this a good recommendation for you?

Comments

Failed to load comments. Please try again.

Explore more

The original headline is: "I Scanned 3 Major AI Agent Frameworks. Here Are the 332 Critical Vulnerabilities"
Dev.to
I Opened 3 Security Issues on Microsoft AutoGen and LlamaIndex. Here Is Why
Dev.to
We security-graded 117,854 AI agent skills. Here's what we found.
Dev.to
The original title is: "I Built an AI Security Scanner — Then Found a Bug in My Own Detector"
Dev.to