Dev.to
5/11/2026

Multi-Paxos vs Strong-Sync Primary/Replica vs Raft: Which HA Model Actually Gets You RPO=0 in 2026?
Short summary
Distributed consensus protocols like Paxos, Raft, and Multi-Paxos solve the split-brain problem differently: quorum-based systems allow continued operation during minority failures, while strong-sync replication sacrifices availability for safety. OceanBase's Multi-Paxos implementation achieves RPO=0 (zero data loss) by requiring log entries to persist on a majority of replicas before commit. Multi-Paxos offers more flexibility than Raft for geographic distribution and latency optimization, enabling both data safety and write availability simultaneously.
- •Paxos and Multi-Paxos prevent split-brain through quorum-based majority agreement
- •Quorum consensus enables both RPO=0 and continued availability during minority failures
- •Multi-Paxos provides geographic flexibility and latency optimization that Raft and strong-sync cannot match
Generated with AI, which can make mistakes.
Is this a good recommendation for you?



